Ok so it sounds like it was updated for design reasons, which is fine. In answer to your question above Diego, SEO done right should always be (as I said above) SEO > web build > SEO. That means performing keyword research, assessing search behavior, reverse engineering competitors and mapping out site structure, and key elements, before you even begin thinking about design. Most people unfortunately get it wrong, and this is something i hear from business owners all the time when they call me enquiring about SEO "John, we've just finished building our site, were now ready to start SEO" and when I look at the site its an absolute mess. Telling a business owner that they've just wasted $15, 000 and we need to pull the site apart and start over isnt a great conversation to have. I always say, building a site first then thinking about SEO is like building a house then asking an architect to draw up plans - its totally backwards. Another thing that should have been considered (which Im sure you're probably well aware of) is having an indepth understanding of - a) the clients target audience b) the message c) site objectives (leads, sales, signups, downloads, optins etc) Once you have a good understanding of these things - the design should wrap around that as well. Again a lot of business owners get lost in the trivial stuff - "Make the logo look nice" "Put a bowl of fruit on the homepage" "Show two elderly people holding hands on the beach" Anyway, I think you get my point. I havent read all the comments above and Im sure there might be a few people saying "wait" "dont change the URl structure" etc, but most of that is nonsense. If you're thinking about SEO, you should be thinking about doing whatever you need to in order to get results. 99% of the time that means pulling stuff apart and putting it back together so that it works. And that doesnt mean "undoing" any of the clients work, it simply means enhancing it. By the way, that concerns me a bit when you say "She wanted to keep her SEO that she did herself".